The Gambia Revenue Authority (GRA) was established in 2004 by
an Act of Parliament (National Assembly).
It merged the Customs and Excise and the Income Tax Departments. In a statement posted on the GRA website, the
current Director General claims that his agency collects “about 20% of GDP and
80% of government revenue” thus making it the premier revenue collection agency
of the government.
The rationalization of government departments, as well all
major restructuring exercise in the private sector, is driven by the primary
objective of enhancing efficiency and thus increasing the revenue (profit)
streams of the operation. The same concept generally applies to the
private sector as well.
In the case of the GRA, the rationale is no different. But has centralization increased both
efficiency of operations and increased revenue?
The jury is still out on both questions.
And we are being charitable on the efficiency question for lack of
tangible evidence resulting from unreliable data in the era of Jammeh. One this can be said is that the rollout of
the Value Added Tax did not inspire confidence in the new GRA and was
considered a disaster that left great many businessmen and women, especially
the petty traders and small businesses, frustrated, confused and felt
cheated.
We have written numerous blog posts for a number of years on the subject and you can find some of them here and here and here. The efficiency issue is not specific to GRA but it is a civil service-wide problem that the new administration must respond to, perhaps in conjunction with a total review of the Government Statistics Bureau.
We have written numerous blog posts for a number of years on the subject and you can find some of them here and here and here. The efficiency issue is not specific to GRA but it is a civil service-wide problem that the new administration must respond to, perhaps in conjunction with a total review of the Government Statistics Bureau.
Back to the efficiency and enhanced revenue collection
capacity, centralization always concentrates power in the hands of the
few. In the case of the GRA, as we have
seen time and time again, in the ear of Yaya Jammeh, the DG of GRA is the focal
point of every budgetary intervention demanded by the Office of The President,
whether legal or – mostly – illegal demands on the agency. Either it is transfer of collected revenue
that belongs to the Gambian people to the private business entities of Jammeh
or for his private use.
By centralizing the revenue collection capabilities of an
entire government into what we now called the GRA, Jammeh has created a one-stop-shop to satisfy
his insatiable thirst for hard cash by issuing the now infamous Executive
Orders (EOs) to one man, as opposed to having to deal with two or more
individuals - say the Director General of Customs and Commissioner of Income
Tax – which increases the chances of one of them proving to be the bulwark that
prevents the type of abuse to the system that is being revealed in the
Commission of Inquiry into his illicit wealth.
Reverting to the previous status of having a Director
General of Customs and Excise and a Commissioner of Income or Domestic Tax
would return competitiveness between the revenue collection centers that made
the inter-departmental rivalries good for government’s bottom line. Those old enough to remember, the most
anticipated portion of the Annual Budget Speech of the Finance Minister was the
section dealing with the revenue and loss column of the parastatals. Only the Managing Director of NAWEC would
dread having a return of this feature of the annual event.
Finally, it is oxymoron to centralize government revenue
collection while in the same breath promoting the decentralization of
government services which goes hand and clove with power of the purse strings.
It is time the Barrow administration consider disaggregating the GRA into smaller
manageable agencies which is more consistent and supportive of government’s
long-held policy of devolving power from the center to the provincial areas of
the country.